09-08-2014, 01:17 PM
It is a nice article, but a few things seem off.
" Clayton took his American friend... in 2007" to Blue Hole. have been there way before that (as I'm sure countless others have). It seems they have built some additional property there, but the article makes it sound like nothing was there before they built.
"Clayton and Lameroux have the distinction of being the first persons to ever swim in the Blue Hole. " No, I did not go into Blue Hole back when, but am pretty skeptical they were the 1st to do so. Guide book from late 90's lists going into Blue Hole waters. Maybe they mean a different hole?
" Clayton took his American friend... in 2007" to Blue Hole. have been there way before that (as I'm sure countless others have). It seems they have built some additional property there, but the article makes it sound like nothing was there before they built.
"Clayton and Lameroux have the distinction of being the first persons to ever swim in the Blue Hole. " No, I did not go into Blue Hole back when, but am pretty skeptical they were the 1st to do so. Guide book from late 90's lists going into Blue Hole waters. Maybe they mean a different hole?